I’ve blogged before on the overloading of the word scepticism outside of the scientific and sceptical community leading to confusion and false assumptions. @glinner's tweet this morning is a perfect example. In his tweet, Graham said:
“@giagia ugh. I do hate that. Moon landing sceptics are the 'space' version of holocaust deniers.”I quite agree with him, but I do want to take issue with the semantics. The use of the word sceptic for those non accepting of the moon landings, but denier for those non accepting of the holocaust made me think about the distinction between the two words.
Surely if we reserve the word “sceptic” for views and opinions on items without scientific consensus and reliable evidence and use “denial” for the non agreement of widely accepted scientific theory it would avoid confusion.
So for example you could talk about:
Alien Abduction sceptics
Alternative/pseudo medicine sceptics
Past life regression sceptics
And then use the term “denier” exclusively for those who argue against the scientific consensus, thus:
HIV causing Aids deniers
Moon Landing deniers
Climate Change deniers
Adhering to these semantics might help alleviate people outside of the scientific and sceptical community making association with my views and the later list, thus avoiding annoying comments like “Yes I’m a sceptic too, I don’t believe in evolution or the moon landings”
Sorry, just re-read that post and it seems a bit whiney and preachy, normal service of sarcasm and attempted witticism will be resumed in the next post.